You cópio and were beaten by press release that tomorrow will be read in the Head office of the Department of Industry of Madrid, at 11:00 AM, where 1.174 webs like mine we autoaccuse ourselves for being “culprits“ according to the 1st Additional Disposition of the Minister of Culture González Sinde, which personally I ask for the cessation or the resignation for UNPRESENTABLE and not to represent to a socialistic project and IF to the lobbies of the audio-visual one.
Today we have come to this instución to ask for the same dealing and attention that a few weeks behind him gave to some of the lobbies more well-known than the multinational industry of the entertainment has created in this country: "The creators' coalition” (from which they received a list) represents a few interests that press the legislator to protect the economic benefit of a few shareholders; the persons, associations and professionals that we autoaccuse ourselves with this list we want also that they accept our list and bear it in mind, why we feel responsible of protecting like part of the civil society several rights that we see in game, and not only we are speaking about the freedom of expression.
Sharing is good, more than good, necessarily. A humanity who does not share is a humanity who walks towards the darkness and towards the past, the history demonstrates us that the more he has cooperated and shared the more has advanced. The heart of the network is the reply of the information, it is the copy of “zeros and some”, of million word, of image, of knowledge; the politician who does not understand this is missing to his duty to have knowledge on what it treats, and generally it is wrong and is shown up, but we pay the price between all and all.
He has no sense, he is of the past and it is absolutely unviable. All the people will specialist have to repeat it?. You pay attention to the scientists when his investigations tend to a lucrative end, but not when these speak to them about the neutrality in the network … Tim Berners Lee and thousands of specialists it have said skylight: IT DOES NOT OWE AND IT IS POSSIBLE NEITHER to control nor censure the network. It does not owe because it means not to have could adapt and to try to brake those who they have overcome, ballasting the social and economic advance. One cannot because the network has been designed as it is precisely to guarantee that it is irreproachable, more and more million persons with computers desobedencen every day the attempts of censoring and repression, and they do not stop growing. Sharing is something unstoppable, the planetary society has already won, it is impossible to row against this ocean, better to flow bién.
The hackers will create the means and applications that need so that we could keep on exchanging culture and knowledge. It is not an option to spend million Euros in systems destined (fortunately) for the defeat guaranteed in advance, stop throwing our money and understand the situation. For every system that they invent there will go out hundreds of sure alternative hardware that guarantee again the mobility of information and communications all over the planet, hundreds of thousands of persons work so that that does not change for governments that are bandaged to the interests of RECORD and companies, and we are winning, but they criminalize us to million persons: where is the advance with this law?.
These laws are botched jobs that are going to brake not even much less the right of private copy, they dedicate his time against something that they cannot stop, and you already know it; nevertheless it is not important for them, for the way, to close webs that there are autoaccused of this list like those of local associations, trade union sections, neighbors' communities, organizations of civil rights, political parties, cultural associations, university teachers, artists, etc … These entities, persons and associations meet in the sad duty to risk his juridical and economic safety to protect a major bién: "There is had the responsibility of disobeying unjust norms” Martin Luther King.
Does Porqué speak about piracy and lie when what they want is to censure The Network and to eliminate the Freedom of expression?, they reinforce his deceit relating the piracy to the right to private copy, manipulate the words and spread confusion, mix piracy with the Law of Sustainable Economy where really in his Final Disposition 1 they are preparing a system censor to protect a few ludicrous interests that year after year have more benefits although they lose his monopoly positions. There wear out hundreds of million Euros promoting ways destined for the technical and economic defeat for an industry that he refuses to introduce and to adapt itself, they are wearing out a money for nothing. We are not pirates, we are civil and city dwellers that, sincerely, we do not harm anybody, on the contrary, we work and live in the network, want that it is the tool that is already, to cut his freedom away is not an option. We neither assault ships in open sea nor kidnap planes in the international air space, only we share culture because the culture defends itself sharing it.
+ INFO IN http://lalistadesinde.net/
and in http://hacktivistas.net/
No comments:
Post a Comment